Naming, Blaming, Erasing: Van Leeuwen’s Recontextualization–Legitimation Matrix in Bratang Surabaya Coverage, 20 August 2025

Authors

  • Novia Adibatus Shofah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Jiphie Gilia Indriyani UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Moh Atikurrahman UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Asep Abbas Abdullah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/suluk.2025.7.1.63-89

Keywords:

Recontextualization, legitimation strategies, social actors, breaking-news journalism, Theo van Leeuwen CDA

Abstract


This study examines how nine Indonesian online outlets transformed the 20 August 2025 Taman Flora–Bratang traffic accident in Surabaya into stabilised news narratives. Using Theo van Leeuwen’s socio-semiotic framework and a mixed-methods Critical Discourse Analysis, we ask: (1) how actors, actions, time–space, purposes, and legitimations are added or removed; (2) how victims, the car/driver, police, and “road/space” are portrayed (naming, genericisation, activation/passivation, inclusion/exclusion); and (3) which authorisation, moral evaluation, rationalisation, and mythopoesis assign responsibility under breaking-news uncertainty. A parallel, convergent analysis treated sentences (including headlines) as units across nine same-day reports. Quantitatively, we tracked inclusion/exclusion, activation/passivation, gender marking, and legitimation types per sentence; qualitatively, we traced outlet-level patterns via a CDA Matrix, joint displays (actor × legitimation), and a recontextualisation flow. Double-coding (Cohen’s κ template) audited heuristic labels, with discrepancies resolved interpretively. Three recurring narrative packages emerged: (i) a police-led “two-motor” template that simplifies causality and backgrounds the car/driver; (ii) a BPBD-led procedural timeline that individualises the driver yet defers legal judgment; and (iii) a defensive naming-then-denial pattern specifying the car (even plate/model) while disassociating it via surface forensic cues. Early texts privilege authorisation (police/BPBD voice) and rationalisation (procedural/technical accounts); moral cues and mythopoetic framings surface subtly in headlines. Social-actor design personalises/feminises the deceased and functionalises authorities, pre-structuring responsibility maps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Ekström, M. (2002). Epistemologies of TV journalism: A theoretical framework. Journalism, 3(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300301

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156.

KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho

Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.

van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-10-07

How to Cite

Shofah, N. A., Indriyani, J. G., Atikurrahman, M., & Abdullah, A. A. (2025). Naming, Blaming, Erasing: Van Leeuwen’s Recontextualization–Legitimation Matrix in Bratang Surabaya Coverage, 20 August 2025. SULUK : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 7(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.15642/suluk.2025.7.1.63-89

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Maret

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Novia Adibatus Shofah, Jiphie Gilia Indriyani, Moh Atikurrahman, Asep Abbas Abdullah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-print sites, or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work.