Language as a Means of Marginalization in News Headline Discourse on Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2024.15.1.85-104Keywords:
marginalization, discourse analysis, headlines, social mediaAbstract
This critical discourse study examines how language is used to marginalize certain groups in news titles published on social media. It focuses on linguistic elements, including words or terms, phrases, and sentences. As qualitative research employing discourse analysis methods, this study analyzes data from news headlines on social media or online media. Social media was chosen due to its widespread popularity as a source of information. Data analysis follows Fairclough’s theory, which includes text description, interpretation, and explanation. The findings reveal that news headlines often use words, phrases, and sentences to marginalize specific societal groups. Marginalized groups include powerful entities such as government officials accused of legal violations and marginalized individuals such as women. The language used in these headlines frequently involves negative connotations or dysphemisms, which emphasize undesirable traits or behaviors. Additionally, question sentences are employed in headlines to further marginalize these groups. This analysis highlights how linguistic choices in news titles reinforce societal biases and marginalize both dominant and disadvantaged groups.
Downloads
References
Abdulmajid, A. (2019). Media and ideology in the Middle East: A critical discourse analysis. Digest of Middle East Studies, 28(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12179
Alwi, H. (Ed.). (2003). Politik bahasa: Risalah seminar politik bahasa. Pusat Bahasa.
Asri, A. (2022). Mengenal arti dan makna jomblo, hingga sejarahnya. Aksaasri.Com. https://www.aksaasri.com/2021/06/mengenal-arti-dan-makna-jomblo.html
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn and Bacon. Inc.
Bungin, B. (2006). Sosiologi komunikasi: Teori, paradigma, dan diskursus teknologi komunikasi di masyarakat. Kencana Prenada Media.
Çoban, S. (2018). Media, ideology and hegemony. In S. Çoban (Ed.), Media, Ideology and Hegemony (pp. 90–106). Brill.
Derrida, J. (2002). Dekonstruksi spiritual. Jalasutra.
Eriyanto. (2005). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1997). Discourse and social change. PolityPress.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In New Horizons in Linguistics (pp. 140–165). Penguin.
Harjanti, F. D. (2013). Penggunaan bahasa dalam perepresentasian kekuasaan di media cetak. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Harjanti, F. D. (2016). Leksikon sebagai sarana marjinalisasi: Kajian AWK dalam berita kasus Gafatar dan terorisme. KOLITA 14: Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya Keempat Belas, 265–270. https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/default.aspx?tabID=61&src=a&id=315847
Hwia, G. (2010). Kendali interaksional sebagai cerminan Ideologi: Analisis wacana kritis trilogi drama kecoa. Linguistik Indonesia, 28(1), 1–5. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/447
Jorgensen, M. W., & Philips, L. J. (2007). Analisis wacana: Teori dan metode. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kanaka. (2021). Syarat judul berita yang benar. Kanaka: Training, Consulting, and Outbound. https://www.pelatihan-sdm.net/syarat-judul-berita-yang-benar/
KBBI VI Daring. (2016a). Copot. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/copot
KBBI VI Daring. (2016b). Kepruk. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/kepruk
KBBI VI Daring. (2016c). Menimbun. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/menimbun
KBBI VI Daring. (2016d). Pangkas. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/pangkas
KBBI VI Daring. (2016e). Pecat. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/pecat
KBBI VI Daring. (2016f). Raib. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/raib
KBBI VI Daring. (2016g). Seksi. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/seksi
Littman, D. M. (2022). Third places, social capital, and sense of community as mechanisms of adaptive responding for young people who experience social marginalization. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(3–4), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12531
Maritz, A. (2022). Propaganda as expressed through nouns. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 40(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2021.1994436
McCombs, M., & Valenzuela, S. (2020). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. John Wiley & Sons.
Nurudin. (2007). Pengantar komunikasi massa. Grafindo Media Persada.
Ratna, N. K. (2005). Teori, metode, dan teknik penelitian sastra dari strukturalisme hingga poststrukturalisme: Perspektif wacana naratif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Roekhan. (2010). Kekerasan simbolik di media massa. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 38(2), 253–265. https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jbs/article/view/49/22
Sumadiria, A. S. H. (2005). Jurnalistik Indonesia menulis berita dan feature: Panduan praktis jurnalis profesional. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0064
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2006). Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE Publications.
Yurnaldi. (1992). Jurnalistik siap pakai. Angkasa Raya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



