Performing Language Variation to Promote Sociolinguistic Equality: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Flordeluna L. Obispo Annunciation College of Bacon Sorsogon Unit, INC., Philippines
  • Michael L. Estremera Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2025.16.2.124-137

Keywords:

verbatim theatre, language variation, sociolinguistic equality, recorded delivery, public engagement

Abstract

Sociolinguistic equality requires improving public understanding of language variation and challenging language ideologies that perpetuate social inequalities. This study introduces a public engagement strategy using research-based verbatim theatre to promote sociolinguistic equality, defined as the respectful treatment of all language users. The verbatim theatre approach, utilizing recorded delivery, is systematically applied to research data of language variation among older adults in Tyneside. The data selection and development of the “From You to Me” production followed a rigorous process that adhered to the PRISMA 2020 framework. The initial data consisted of 50 hours of interview recordings. Participants were pre-selected for social and linguistic diversity. Extracts were selected based on sociolinguistic representativeness, theatrical criteria, and ethical considerations, resulting in the inclusion of data from thirteen participants in the production. Audience evaluations indicate the production’s potential for improving understanding of language variation and shifting attitudes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, J. L., Belliveau, G., Lea, G. W., & Wager, A. (2011). Delineating a spectrum of research-based theatre. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(8), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411415498

Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2022). The potential of ethnographic drama in the representation, interpretation, and democratization of sociolinguistic research. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(5), 586–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12546

Bucholtz, M. (2018). White effects and sociolinguistic activism. Language in Society, 47(3), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000271

Cosmides, L. (1983). Invariances in the acoustic expression of emotion during speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9(6), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.9.6.864

Dalton, J., Ivory, K., Macneill, P., Nash, L., River, J., Dwyer, P., Hooker, C., Williams, D., & Scott, K. M. (2020). Verbatim theater: Prompting reflection and discussion about healthcare culture as a means of promoting culture change. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 32(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2020.1768099

Garson, C. (2014). Remixing politics: The case of headphone-verbatim theatre in Britain. Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 2(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2014-0005

Hammond, W., & Steward, D. (2008). Verbatim, verbatim: Contemporary documentary theatre. Oberon Books.

Leavy, P. (2020). Methods meet arts: Arts-based research practice (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Oades, R. (2010). Headphone verbatim and audio scripting. In P. Brown (Ed.), Verbatim: Staging memory and community (pp. 84–87). Currency Press.

Paget, D. (1987). ‘Verbatim theatre’: Oral history and documentary. New Theatre Quarterly, 3(12), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00002463

Palmore, E. (2001). The ageism survey: First findings. The Gerontologist, 41(5), 572–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572

Pichler, H. (2025). Performing language variation to promote sociolinguistic equality. Journal of English Linguistics, 53(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242241311257

Ray, R. E. (2007). Narratives as agents of social change: a new direction for narrative gerontologists. In M. Bernard & T. Scharf (Eds.), Critical perspectives on ageing societies (pp. 59–72). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781847422392.ch005

Rickford, J. R. (1999). The Ebonics controversy in my backyard: A sociolinguist’s experiences and reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(2), 267–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00076

Saldaña, J. (2003). Dramatizing data: A primer. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800402250932

Sánchez, R. M. (2020). Performing school failure: Using verbatim theatre to explore school grading policies. LEARNing Landscapes, 13(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v13i1.1015

Taylor, L. (2013). Voice, body and the transmission of the real in documentary theatre. Contemporary Theatre Review, 23(3), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2013.806318

Wake, C. (2013). Headphone verbatim theatre: Methods, histories, genres, theories. New Theatre Quarterly, 29(4), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X13000651

Wilkenson, L., & Anderson, M. (2007). A resurgence of verbatim theatre: Authenticity, empathy and transformation. Australasian Drama Studies, 50, 153–169.

Wolfram, W. (2013). Language awareness in community perspective. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 754–772). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0037

Wolfram, W., Reaser, J., & Vaughn, C. (2008). Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1109–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00092.x

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Obispo, F. L., & Estremera, M. L. (2025). Performing Language Variation to Promote Sociolinguistic Equality: A Systematic Literature Review. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 16(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2025.16.2.124-137