Exploring Sarcasm among Netizens on Instagram: A Social Media Phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2024.15.2.188-202Keywords:
sarcasm, social media, Instagram, cyberbullyingAbstract
This paper explores the prevalent use of sarcasm among Indonesian Instagram users, particularly on the @Insertlive account and its link to cyberbullying. This qualitative study, adopting Keraf’s sarcasm function theory, identifies different types of sarcasm and how offensive language affects communication and social norms in social media. The study reveals different sarcasm functions like rejection, prohibition, information, and vulgarities, indicating that sarcasm is widely used in online communication. On the one hand, sarcasm is a means of laughter and togetherness; on the other hand, however, it is a hostile strategy to insult and criticize. This paper highlights the social benefits of constructive sarcasm compared to its potential harms that may lead to cyberbullying. It is suggested that social media should improve the moderation features and promote positive comments. Besides, future research could examine the effect of sarcasm on the psychological state of targets and observe cultural differences in the use of sarcasm across various platforms.
Downloads
References
Banasik-Jemielniak, N., & Kałowski, P. (2022). Socio-cultural and individual factors in verbal irony use and understanding: What we know, what we don’t know, what we want to know. Review of Communication Research, 10, 80-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.036
Bitterly, T. B., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2019). The impression management benefits of humorous self-disclosures: How humor influences perceptions of veracity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 73-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.036
Chung, A., & Rimal, R. N. (2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
Clyne, L., Fellers, M., & Richards, A. S. (2020). Metacognitive inoculation reduces the persuasiveness of sarcastic attack messages. Communication Reports, 33(2), 68-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1755876
Farley, S. D. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on emotional expression beyond the face: On the importance of multiple channels of communication and context. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 45(4), 413-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-021-00323-5
Guerrero, L. K., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2017). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Sage Publications.
Halttu, K., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2022). Susceptibility to social influence strategies and persuasive system design: exploring the relationship. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(12), 2705-2726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1948427
Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence against women, 21(6), 758-779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215591509
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory (pp. 3-17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20061-3_1
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
Hootsuite. (2021). Social media trends 2021. Hootsuite.Com. https://www.hootsuite.com/research/social-trends
Hutcheon, L. (2023). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. University of Illinois Press.
Krahé, B. (2020). The social psychology of aggression. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330244
Lee, S., & Lee, J. M. (2022). L2 pragmatic comprehension of aural sarcasm: Tone, context, and literal meaning. System, 105, 102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102724
Nababan, S. (2023). Digital Media Literacy Strategy for the Information Disruption Era in Improving the Communication Ethics of the Yogyakarta Community. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(2), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i2.689
Oishi, E. (2016). Austin’s speech acts and Mey’s pragmemes. In K. Allan, A. Capone, & I. Kecskes, (Ed.), Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use (pp. 335-350). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27957-3_19
O’Reilly, K., Peterson, C. C., & Wellman, H. M. (2014). Sarcasm and advanced theory of mind understanding in children and adults with prelingual deafness. Developmental psychology, 50(7), 1862. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036124
Pandey, J. (2022). Persuasion and Compliance: Dimensions and Measurement. In Nature and Dynamics of Social Influence: Interpersonal and Organizational Contexts (pp. 153-181). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67218-9_7
Park, C., Lim, Y., Choi, J., & Sung, J. E. (2021). Changes in linguistic behaviors based on smart speaker task performance and pragmatic skills in multiple turn-taking interactions. Intelligent Service Robotics, 14(3), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-021-00341-2
Scott, S. (2016). Negotiating identity: Symbolic interactionist approaches to social identity. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767377.ch1
Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. Teachers College Press.
Shahab, M. H., Ghazali, E., & Mohtar, M. (2021). The role of elaboration likelihood model in consumer behavior research and its extension to new technologies: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 664-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12658
Sheppes, G., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psychology, 11, 379-405. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739
Snead, K. C., Magal, S. R., Christensen, L. F., & Ndede-Amadi, A. A. (2015). Attribution theory: a theoretical framework for understanding information systems success. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9331-2
Sodian, B. (2014). Theory of mind—The case for conceptual development. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Ed.), Young children’s cognitive development (pp. 95-130). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203579115-5
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukarto, K. A., & Fauziah, F. (2022). Satire and Sarcasm on the “YouTube Got Talent” Video: A Case Study on Skinnyindonesian24 Channel. Journal of Communication, 10(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2002009
Syafitri, Y. D. T., Budiarti, V., Simamora, A., & Aprilya, R. (2019). Examining Various Interpretations of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 1(2), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.21831/elsya.v1i2.28315
Watts, R. J. (2019). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In S. Ide & K. Ehlich (Ed.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, (pp. 43-70). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14137-2_3
Ziegele, M., & Jost, P. B. (2020). Not funny? The effects of factual versus sarcastic journalistic responses to uncivil user comments. Communication Research, 47(6), 891-920. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0093650216671854
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
