Death of Critical Approaches: Towards Aesthetics of Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2025.16.2.111-123Keywords:
literature, approaches, criticism, aesthetics, literary approachesAbstract
This paper explores the shifting landscape of literary criticism, tracing the decline of traditional frameworks—such as formalism, structuralism, and historicism—in favor of a renewed aesthetic engagement with literature. This research aims to investigate how and why critical approaches have lost prominence in literary discourse and to examine the alternative modes of interpretation emerging in their place. In response to this critical turning point, the paper introduces a speculative interpretive model termed resonant aesthetics. This emerging approach foregrounds the vibrational relationship between reader and text, where meaning arises not through analytical dissection but through intuitive, affective, and atmospheric immersion. The findings suggest that contemporary literary studies increasingly prioritize emotional resonance, experiential presence, and sensory perception, signaling a paradigm shift in how literature is valued and understood. Resonant aesthetics, as proposed in this paper, offers a new methodological framework for engaging with texts—one that embraces the ephemeral and the ineffable as integral to literary meaning. Ultimately, the paper argues for an expanded conception of literary criticism that revitalizes aesthetics as a primary mode of understanding in the 21st century.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T. W. (1970). Aesthetic theory (R. Hullot-Kentor, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Anker, E., & Felski, R. (Eds.). (2017). Critique and postcritique. Duke University Press.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
Brooks, C. (1947). The well-wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press.
Derrida, J. (1967). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. University of Minnesota Press.
Felski, R. (2015). The limits of critique. University of Chicago Press.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard University Press.
Gallagher, C., & Greenblatt, S. (Eds.). (2000). Practicing new historicism. University of Chicago Press.
Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press.
Greenblatt, S. (1988). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hooks, B. (1994). Art on my mind: Visual politics. The New Press.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Jameson, F. (1981). The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Cornell University Press.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918
Levine, C. (2015). Forms: Whole, rhythm, hierarchy, network. Princeton University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology (C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf, Trans.). Basic Books.
Li, W., et al. (2024). Literature as ideology and aesthetic experience. Journal of Literary Theory, 18(2), 145–162.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly feelings. Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Oatley, K. (2011). Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Alfred A. Knopf.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1917)
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Švelch, J., et al. (2022). Computational literary history. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(3), 455–477.
Williams, R. (1981). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
